Teams

McCaskill/LF

2025 TUL ADULT 40 & Over WOMEN League · 2.5 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-28vs TULSA: Wills/TTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesTia Hill / LaQuisha Epps vs Sarah Garrow / Janna Lemons0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Hoskins / Cathy Hodgs vs Tracy Mills / Nina Butchko6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-10vs Farmer-McCorkle/LFSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephanie McCaskill / Tia Hill vs Tracey Farmer / Janell Miller6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesRobin Hoskins vs Lauren Lane1-6, 1-6
2024-09-30vs Hendrix40s2.5/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesTia Hill / Robin Hoskins vs Allison Creel / Amber Hendrix2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRashell Ruefly vs Katy Spangler0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Jackson / Cathy Hodgs vs Crystal Maguire / Haddi Nunley0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
LaQuisha Epps
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Tia Hill
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.37
Stephanie McCaskill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Stephanie Jackson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Robin Hoskins
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.94
Cathy Hodgs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.78
Rashell Ruefly
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LaQuisha Epps + Stephanie McCaskill7352% games+5.2% vs expected
Tia Hill + Robin Hoskins4347% games+5.2% vs expected
LaQuisha Epps + Tia Hill2742% games−4.7% vs expected
Stephanie Jackson + Tia Hill4838% games−7.9% vs expected
Cathy Hodgs + Rashell Ruefly1628% games−9.2% vs expected
Stephanie McCaskill + Robin Hoskins0623% games−12.8% vs expected
Tia Hill + Stephanie McCaskill3358% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Jackson + Stephanie McCaskill134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

LaQuisha Epps
46W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.66
Tia Hill
40W–64L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.42
Stephanie McCaskill
27W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Stephanie Jackson
14W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26
Robin Hoskins
15W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.25
2.5
Cathy Hodgs
7W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Rashell Ruefly
7W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.