Teams

RP: Joan Steere

2024 RI Adult 55 & Over Women · 6.0 Women 1

13 players · average NTRP 2.60 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-21vs CC: Grand Slam/McVayLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Parrish / Amy Dorfman vs Deanna Detorie / Denise Smith0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTeri Caldwell / Saskia Schulte Vennema vs Michelle Russo / Francine McVay6-2, 1-6, 3-4
L#3 DoublesSharon Kelley / Randy-Lynn Kroll vs Tina Odessa / Shelley Berger4-6, 5-7
2024-08-14vs CC: Slice Girls/MendozaLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeri Caldwell / Claudia Silva vs Martha Mendoza / Elizabeth Lewis0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Lou Seaward / Barbara Kowack-Murthy vs Amy Rice / Tricia Frary2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Culp / Amy Dorfman vs Joan Fletcher / Katy Shea4-6, 5-7
2024-08-07vs FC: Funsters/BarnabeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBarbara Parrish / Teri Caldwell vs Denise Mckee / Jayne Bedigian4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMary Lou Seaward / Karen Chretien vs Karen Scanlan / Garly Chan6-4, 6-0
2024-07-31vs RP: Rally Sisters/RousseauLost 12
W#1 DoublesSaskia Schulte Vennema / Teri Caldwell vs Renee Chace / Renee Rousselle6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesClaudia Silva / Karen Culp vs Marylou Ferri / Jennie Allen2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Dorfman / Karen Chretien vs Carmen Rousseau / Irene Reidemeister4-6, 2-6
2024-07-16vs FC: Funsters/BarnabeLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Lou Seaward / Karen Chretien vs Lesa Brehio / Garly Chan6-7, 4-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSaskia Schulte Vennema / Claudia Silva vs Christine Rice / Kris Mayer2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRandy-Lynn Kroll / Barbara Kowack-Murthy vs Lyse-Anne Lepine / Michelle Fahy0-6, 0-6
2024-07-13vs CC: Grand Slam/McVayLost 03
L#1 DoublesDeborah Werchadlo / Teri Caldwell vs Deanna Detorie / Denise Smith1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Culp / Randy-Lynn Kroll vs Amy Dressler / Shelley Berger2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Chretien / Sharon Kelley vs Julie Healy / Barbara McNeilly3-6, 3-6
2024-06-29vs CC: Slice Girls/MendozaLost 02
L#2 DoublesMary Lou Seaward / Sharon Kelley vs Susan Eigen / Robin Traquina3-6, 6-4, 2-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Culp / Claudia Silva vs Martha Mendoza / Amy Rice1-6, 0-6
2024-06-06vs RP: Rally Sisters/RousseauLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Culp / Saskia Schulte Vennema vs Jennie Allen / Marylou Ferri0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Lou Seaward / Barbara Kowack-Murthy vs Lisa Delfino / Kristen Rao1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Dorfman / Karen Chretien vs Irene Reidemeister / Denise Diorio3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Mary Lou Seaward
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Barbara Parrish
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Saskia Schulte Vennema
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Karen Chretien
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Amy Dorfman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Claudia Silva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Deborah Werchadlo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Barbara Kowack-Murthy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.92
Randy-Lynn Kroll
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joan Steere
published
Karen Culp
published
Sharon Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Teri Caldwell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Saskia Schulte Vennema + Teri Caldwell314 matchesnot enough data
Saskia Schulte Vennema + Mary Lou Seaward134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Lou Seaward
34W–46L career · 8 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Barbara Parrish
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Saskia Schulte Vennema
37W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
Karen Chretien
19W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%60%40%
2.47
2.5
Amy Dorfman
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Claudia Silva
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Deborah Werchadlo
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Barbara Kowack-Murthy
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Randy-Lynn Kroll
23W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Joan Steere
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Culp
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Kelley
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Teri Caldwell
23W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.