Teams

Arroyo Vista Hot Flashes

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.85 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-17Won 30
W#1 DoublesErin MacKie / Stefanie Wah vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTracee Nilsson / Jennifer Stewart vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Giammarrusco / Lynne F Krueger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-09vs Spanish ReignSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Blackwood / Diane Perryman vs Lynn Meaney / Joy Henning3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Giammarrusco / Jami Shane vs Nancy Caramelli / Laura Kiker5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-08-01vs WAC Wonder WomenLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Blackwood / Corrine Weiner vs Tanja Daniel / Karen Walker5-7, 3-6
2025-07-26vs Match Point Mavens 55Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Blackwood / Diane Perryman vs Kathleen Feig / Michelle Jackson5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStefanie Wah / Corrine Weiner vs Paula Medina / Wyne Quinn7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-19vs Lola's Ladies at PierpontLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Stewart / Corrine Weiner vs Jacqui Burge / Barbara Connelly5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Rosenberg / Wendy Schoenburg vs Lauren Koenig / Denise McNulty2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-13vs V-LLW Team Corbin - CorbinLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Perryman / Corrine Weiner vs Lisa Taylor / Bridget Thordarson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Schoenburg / Teri Terrusa vs Robin Hittelman / Ingrid Konupek2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Diane Perryman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Jami Shane
published 4
3.65
Teri Terrusa
published
3.58
Erin MacKie
published 4
3.58
Tracee Nilsson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Kimberly Blackwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Corrine Weiner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Karen Rosenberg
published
3.45
Denise Modglin
published 4
3.41
Sophia McCreary
published
3.39
Stefanie Wah
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Lynne F Krueger
published
3.30
Wendy Schoenburg
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Cindy Giammarrusco
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Schoenburg + Stefanie Wah8758% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Schoenburg + Corrine Weiner7553% gamesnot enough data
Stefanie Wah + Corrine Weiner1546% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Giammarrusco + Lynne F Krueger134 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Blackwood + Corrine Weiner314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Blackwood + Tracee Nilsson033 matchesnot enough data
Corrine Weiner + Tracee Nilsson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Perryman
91W–104L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Jami Shane
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Teri Terrusa
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.65
4
Erin MacKie
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Tracee Nilsson
52W–89L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Kimberly Blackwood
119W–146L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Corrine Weiner
89W–108L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Karen Rosenberg
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Denise Modglin
0W–10L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.45
Sophia McCreary
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.41
3.5
Stefanie Wah
149W–129L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Lynne F Krueger
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Wendy Schoenburg
200W–104L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Cindy Giammarrusco
44W–69L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.