Teams

Baldwin

2025 Anne Arundel Tri-Level · Anne Arundel Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-30vs NicholsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Mellynchuk / Dawn Orso vs Martha Nolan / Brandie Sparr6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Dawson / Nicole Gownley vs Joanne Connelly / Laura Laabs6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-20vs MartinWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Mulholland / Sadie Simpson vs Masako Murphy / Claire Rossmark6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErin McVeigh / Giovanna Schummer vs Teresa Taylor / Peggy Bailey6-3, 6-3
2025-09-10vs Stellar Strikers TriWon 10
W#2 DoublesDawn Orso / Nicole Gownley vs Kimberly Walko / Aklil Getachew6-2, 6-4
2025-09-07vs Tami TriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Mellynchuk / Dawn Orso vs Dina Caddeo / Helen Patterson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Mulholland / Sadie Simpson vs Stephanie Mackowiak / Cindy Mexcur5-7, 2-6
2025-09-06vs Party at the NetLost 01
L#2 DoublesSadie Simpson / Leann Gibbs vs Meghan Reinhart / Belinda McLean3-6, 6-7
2025-08-17vs WalshSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeann Gibbs / Amy Dawson vs Anh Le / Sadie Callow2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGiovanna Schummer / Bridget Kelly vs Stephanie Ruskin / Alexandra Bray7-6, 6-4
2025-08-09vs MartinWon 20
W#2 DoublesLeann Gibbs / Nicole Gownley vs Masako Murphy / Claire Rossmark2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Conroy / Erin McVeigh vs Cynthia Wofford / Yulin Henry6-2, 6-1
2025-08-07vs Tami TriLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Mulholland / Lisa Mellynchuk vs Lisa Thompson / Brandie Sparr0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Lucy Wang
published
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.63
Lisa Mellynchuk
published
3.51
Lisa Mulholland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Dawn Orso
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Erin McVeigh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Brenae Fadden
published 3.5
3.26
Meghan Miller
published
3.25
Leann Gibbs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristen Burke
published
3.10
Kim Reed
published
3.04
Nicole Gownley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Laura Conroy
published
2.94
Bridget Kelly
published 3
2.76
Giovanna Schummer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leann Gibbs + Lisa Mulholland3350% games+1.6% vs expected
Nicole Gownley + Leann Gibbs7553% games−2.3% vs expected
Nicole Gownley + Lisa Mulholland213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucy Wang
34W–15L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.85
4
Kelsey Forbes
140W–112L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
Lisa Mellynchuk
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Lisa Mulholland
79W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Dawn Orso
48W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Erin McVeigh
101W–83L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Brenae Fadden
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Meghan Miller
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Leann Gibbs
98W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Kristen Burke
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Kim Reed
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Nicole Gownley
57W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Laura Conroy
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Bridget Kelly
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Giovanna Schummer
48W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.