Teams

Lori Hunt

2025 Springfield Adult 18 & Over Fall Leagues · 3.0 Fall Session 2 Adult Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-10vs Emmilyn MurphyLost 02
L#1 DoublesKenya Pearman / Isabella Rosas vs Emmilyn Murphy / Nicole Liljenquist1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Hays / Cathy Knight vs Jennifer Cotner-Jones / Susan Tolbert3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-11-12vs Emmilyn MurphyLost 12
W#1 DoublesLacey Quale / Kenya Pearman vs Catherine Schmittling / Jennifer Cotner-Jones7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesIsabella Rosas vs Nicole Liljenquist5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Hays / Cathy Knight vs Emmilyn Murphy / Susan Tolbert2-6, 3-6
2024-11-05vs Emmilyn MurphyLost 03
L#1 DoublesLacey Quale / Kenya Pearman vs Emmilyn Murphy / Nicole Liljenquist3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesIsabella Rosas vs Susan Tolbert2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Hays / Cathy Knight vs Catherine Schmittling / Jennifer Cotner-Jones0-6, 0-6
2024-10-22vs Emmilyn MurphyLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Mayr / Kenya Pearman vs Lori Hunt / Catherine Schmittling4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesIsabella Rosas vs Susan Tolbert3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Cotner-Jones / Cathy Knight vs Stephanie Turk / Diane Hays5-7, 2-6
2024-10-15vs Emmilyn MurphyLost 02
L#1 SinglesIsabella Rosas vs Susan Tolbert0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKenya Pearman / Cathy Knight vs Lori Hunt / Stephanie Turk4-6, 1-6
2024-10-08vs Emmilyn MurphyLost 01
L#1 DoublesKenya Pearman / Tijuana Julian vs Nicole Liljenquist / Stephanie Turk7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-01vs Emmilyn MurphyLost 02
L#1 SinglesIsabella Rosas vs Susan Tolbert2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Knight / Madison Noe vs Nicole Liljenquist / Diane Hays5-7, 5-7
2024-09-24vs Lori HuntSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Mayr / Kenya Pearman vs Stephanie Turk / Susan Tolbert6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTijuana Julian / Isabella Rosas vs Diane Jewell / Nicole Liljenquist1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Fall Session 2 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Kenya Pearman
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.45
Cathy Knight
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Diane Hays
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 2.5
Isabella Rosas
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Lacey Quale
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Hunt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Hays + Cathy Knight033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenya Pearman
27W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
2.5
Cathy Knight
17W–49L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.45
2.5
Diane Hays
6W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Isabella Rosas
0W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lacey Quale
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Hunt
25W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.