Teams

ANTELOPE TA/ANTELOPE COMMUNITY PK 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Vivi Zhang
published
3.50
Vinh Sae
published
3.42
Jill Mahoney
published
3.38
Rachel Leung
published
3.35
Kathi Peterson
published
3.33
Camille Leyson
published 3.5
3.26
Rhona Wu
published
3.25
Rosalie Calabrese
published
3.23
Denise Canacari
published 3.5
3.20
Tamara Jerd
published
3.19
Lee Yoshikawa
published
3.15
Susie O'Brien
published
3.14
Hee-Sook Koenig
published 3.5
3.14
Kateryna Elitzin
published
3.08
Carmel Lindner
published 3.5
3.08
Imelda Ismael
published 3
3.05
Elvamae Frofunga
published 3.5
3.01
Lisa Holverson
published
2.85
Marion Sanders
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhona Wu + Vinh Sae8651% games+6.3% vs expected
Rosalie Calabrese + Kathi Peterson5550% games+1.1% vs expected
Lee Yoshikawa + Elvamae Frofunga134 matchesnot enough data
Marion Sanders + Susie O'Brien303 matchesnot enough data
Vinh Sae + Lee Yoshikawa213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vivi Zhang
24W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
Vinh Sae
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
Jill Mahoney
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Rachel Leung
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Kathi Peterson
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Camille Leyson
32W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
Rhona Wu
13W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Rosalie Calabrese
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Denise Canacari
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Tamara Jerd
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Lee Yoshikawa
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Susie O'Brien
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Hee-Sook Koenig
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
Kateryna Elitzin
31W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
3.5
Carmel Lindner
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Imelda Ismael
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3.5
Elvamae Frofunga
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
Lisa Holverson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Marion Sanders
13W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.