Teams

The Slice Is Right 3.5

2025 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Brauna Martin
published 3.5
3.21
Alexis Feringa
published 3.5
3.02
Jane Davenport
published
3.02
Megan Rappolt
published
2.98
Elizabeth Nicholson
published
2.95
Paula Pels
published
2.94
Lenora Rigby
published
2.90
Suzanne Kimpel
published
2.89
Noeline Arul
published
2.80
Saira Malik
published
2.80
Margaret Cornelius
published
2.79
Adrienne Allen
published 3
2.52
Lemin Xiao
published
Melissa Ingber
published
Stevi Calandra
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrienne Allen + Megan Rappolt3260% gamesnot enough data
Jane Davenport + Margaret Cornelius224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brauna Martin
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alexis Feringa
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Jane Davenport
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Megan Rappolt
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Elizabeth Nicholson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Paula Pels
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
Lenora Rigby
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
Suzanne Kimpel
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Noeline Arul
16W–44L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89
Saira Malik
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Margaret Cornelius
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Adrienne Allen
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Lemin Xiao
16W–28L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Melissa Ingber
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stevi Calandra
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.