Teams

Witte/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-19vs Greer/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Zanca / Anne von Lanken vs Leigh Ann Carkeet / Emily Mcallister6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Motte / Julie Aquino vs Mary Margaret Posey / Leigh Lamb1-6, 1-6
2025-11-12vs McLaughlin/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnne von Lanken vs Lyndsay Gronostaj6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Gilbert / Julie Aquino vs Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin / Liza Easley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-05vs Conrad/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Wilkes Yonchak / Laura Weaver vs Mary Anne Pohlman / Allison Cleeton6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAnne von Lanken vs Amber McCabe4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAllison Gilbert / KIMBERLY JUSSELY vs Amanda Ricketts / Tressa Ogles6-4, 6-1
2025-11-04vs McLaughlin/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarissa Benedict / Caitlin Motte vs Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin / Angela Finerson2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMary Wilkes Yonchak vs Candace Askew6-1, 6-0
2025-10-29vs McDermott/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Aquino / Anna Witte vs Julie Little / Katie McDermott0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Wilkes Yonchak / Allison Gilbert vs Krystal Shaw / Anna Avant4-6, 0-6
2025-10-21vs Greer/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne von Lanken / Mary Wilkes Yonchak vs Kelsey Watts / Clare Swatley5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesHannah Hackett vs Mary Margaret Posey3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKIMBERLY JUSSELY / Marissa Benedict vs Suzanne Lomax / Leigh Lamb4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-10-08vs Magness/MemphisWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Gilbert / Julie Aquino vs Jeannie Boyd / Sarah Rager6-0, 7-5
2025-10-01vs Rohlinger/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Wilkes Yonchak / Hannah Hackett vs Samantha Rohlinger / Lindsay Miklos5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAnne von Lanken vs Caitlyn Arkwright3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Motte / KIMBERLY JUSSELY vs Cori Egan / Danielle Muntean3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McDermott/Memphis7118614136
2Rohlinger/Memphis6219510134
3Justice/Memphis6216819157
4Greer/Memphis5317717190
5Thornton/Memphis53131124202
6Davis/Memphis44121224191
7Wright/Memphis44121227217
8Witte/Memphis44111328197
9Flynt/Memphis26101431228
10McLaughlin/Memphis2691532231
11SLewis/Memphis2681633239
12Steffner/Memphis2691533240
13Magness/Memphis0812347291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.52
Marissa Benedict
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Anne von Lanken
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.24
Mary Wilkes Yonchak
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.22
Hannah Hackett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.18
Julie Aquino
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.01
KIMBERLY JUSSELY
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.00
Caitlin Motte
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marissa Benedict
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
2.5
Anne von Lanken
16W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
Mary Wilkes Yonchak
10W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Hannah Hackett
11W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.22
Julie Aquino
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
KIMBERLY JUSSELY
14W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Caitlin Motte
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.