Teams

C 5.5W BA Kramer

2023 NEOTA Combo Spring · NEOTA 5.5W Combo Spring

14 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-14vs C 5.5W WE2 StrawserSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Streit / Teresa Ronda vs Yeva Dade / Gail Vogel7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Jones / Jenn Johnson vs Roxane Durant / Leigh Strawser0-6, 0-6
2023-03-24vs C 5.5W CV UrbanowskiLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Kramer / Teresa Ronda vs Jennifer Marthe / Carrie Fromson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Jones / Amber Fulgenzi vs Betsey Poe / Sarah Ciavarro1-6, 0-6
2023-03-03vs C 5.5W WE2 StrawserSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDenise Maietta / Teresa Ronda vs Yeva Dade / Mindy Qua6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesYolanda Hohman / Laura Longo vs Roxane Durant / Jennifer Zidar1-6, 6-7
2023-02-10vs C 5.5W CV UrbanowskiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Streit / Leslie Catalano vs Lisa Manis / Robin Kleinman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Jones / Grace Zilich vs Kimberly Rottman / Mary Murray3-6, 5-7
2022-04-10vs C 5.5W WE2 StrawserWon 10
W#2 DoublesYolanda Hohman / Jennifer Goddard vs Esther McElhinney / Amy Lawrence4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 5.5W Combo Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Laura Streit
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.69
Yolanda Hohman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Denise Maietta
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.30
Teresa Ronda
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jamie Routman
published 2.5
2.16
Leslie Catalano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.07
Jenn Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.92
Amber Fulgenzi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.79
Laura Longo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Beth Baskin
published
Grace Zilich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Goddard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Kramer
published
Pam Nelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yolanda Hohman + Denise Maietta0628% games−14.0% vs expected
Laura Longo + Jenn Johnson0914% games−15.3% vs expected
Teresa Ronda + Leslie Catalano0521% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Ronda + Jenn Johnson044 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Ronda + Jamie Routman134 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Catalano + Jamie Routman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Streit
50W–13L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Yolanda Hohman
50W–82L career · 4 lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
2.69
3
Denise Maietta
31W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
2.63
Teresa Ronda
8W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Jamie Routman
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Catalano
2W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Jenn Johnson
10W–38L career · 1 line in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07
2.5
Amber Fulgenzi
1W–6L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Laura Longo
1W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.79
Beth Baskin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Grace Zilich
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Goddard
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Kramer
25W–28L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pam Nelson
18W–35L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.