Teams

KY/LOU/KIRBY

2025 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER · 3.5 MEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-27vs KY/LOU/GROTONSplit 11
L#1 SinglesEddie Goodman vs Alden Homrich1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesJonathan Hahn vs Sean Nilsen6-3, 6-2
2025-08-19vs KY/LOU/GROTONLost 12
W#1 SinglesCharles Fernandez vs Troy Johnson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesEddie Goodman vs Alden Homrich6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJustin Powers vs Andrew Renda1-6, 2-6
2025-08-06vs KY/LOU/GROTONWon 30
W#1 SinglesCharles Fernandez vs Alden Homrich6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCaley Coughlan vs Teddy Groton6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSam Gabrielli vs Eric Estill6-3, 7-6
2025-07-29vs KY/LOU/GROTONWon 20
W#1 SinglesCharles Fernandez vs Ben Birkby6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEddie Goodman vs Andrew Renda6-2, 6-3
2025-07-24vs KY/LOU/GROTONWon 20
W#1 SinglesCharles Fernandez vs Ashkan Rezai6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSam Gabrielli vs Sean Nilsen7-5, 7-5
2025-07-16vs KY/LOU/GROTONWon 21
W#1 SinglesCharles Fernandez vs Teddy Groton6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSam Gabrielli vs Alden Homrich3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesCaley Coughlan vs Ashkan Rezai6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-08vs KY/LOU/GROTONWon 20
W#1 SinglesAdam Kirby vs Troy Johnson7-5, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJonathan Hahn vs Ben Birkby7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/KIRBY6116517177
2KY/LOU/GROTON1651633205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Caley Coughlan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.60
Charles Fernandez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.42
Jonathan Hahn
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.34
Eddie Goodman
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Justin Powers
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.18
Adam Kirby
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Sam Gabrielli
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Kirby + Jonathan Hahn134 matchesnot enough data
Justin Powers + Jonathan Hahn033 matchesnot enough data
Justin Powers + Caley Coughlan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caley Coughlan
44W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Charles Fernandez
41W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Jonathan Hahn
38W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Eddie Goodman
39W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Justin Powers
45W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Adam Kirby
19W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Sam Gabrielli
9W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.