Teams

1-Gregson/JByrd4.0-Eno

2023 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men-Evening

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-05-12vs 3-CMansfield-ElmiraSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMatthew James vs Zack Czajkowski7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicholas Lau / Nick Gilder vs Raymond Xu / Ryan Sheppard6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-10vs 2-JJByrd/JCollins-EnoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesNick Gilder / Nicholas Lau vs Andrew Perdue / Kwame Owens2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMatthew James vs Thomas Gaither6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-26vs 4-RGoff - ElmiraWon 20
W#1 DoublesNicholas Lau / Nick Gilder vs Ryan Berliner / Al Pick6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesMatthew James vs Michael Pournaras6-1, 6-3
2023-04-17vs 5-MYoung-ElmiraWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas Lau / Nick Gilder vs Evan Pozzanghera / Justin Frye6-1, 6-2
2023-04-12vs 7-JFranklin-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesBlake Watkins / Nick Gilder vs Jeffery Johnson / Tevin Wilson6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-29vs 4-RGoff - ElmiraWon 10
W#1 DoublesNick Gilder / Nicholas Lau vs Ryan Berliner / William Clark6-2, 6-2
2023-03-27vs 3-CMansfield-ElmiraWon 10
W#1 DoublesNick Gilder / Nicholas Lau vs Gabriel Iocco / Ryan Sheppard6-1, 6-1
2023-03-22vs 2-JJByrd/JCollins-EnoWon 10
W#3 DoublesNicholas Lau / Nick Gilder vs Blake Hutchinson / Hugh Harris2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-06vs 5-MYoung-ElmiraWon 10
W#2 DoublesNick Gilder / Nicholas Lau vs Michael Weslander / Naveen Natesh7-6, 6-3
2023-02-27vs 6-DBaddour-CHCC 18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAubry Carmody / Nick Gilder vs David Baddour / Christian Shelby1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Matthew James
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Evan Glasner
published
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.00
Aubry Carmody
published 4
3.93
Maxwell Gregson
published
3.93
Craig Radley
published 4
3.89
Nick Gilder
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.83
Seth Layton
published
3.80
Scott Scarneo
published
3.72
Alex Piasecki
published 4
3.63
Stephen Stark
published
Jared Balcavage
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Matthew James
67W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
Evan Glasner
15W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
4.08
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 7 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Aubry Carmody
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
Maxwell Gregson
23W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Craig Radley
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Nick Gilder
111W–89L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
Seth Layton
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Scott Scarneo
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Alex Piasecki
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Stephen Stark
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
Jared Balcavage
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.