Teams

Burke 3.5W 40s Tues PM

2024 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Becky Kincaid
published 3.5
3.19
Susan Calkins
published
3.18
Jan Whittaker
published
3.15
Jaime Hendricks
published
3.14
Leslie Crooker
published
3.12
Vickie Degges
published
3.10
Gina Kinard
published
3.00
Susan Sinclair
published
2.93
Darci Gold
published 3.5
2.87
Pam Ferrell
published
2.84
Beverly Burke
published 3
2.83
Brenda MacFadden
published 3
2.77
Jennie Pekarne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Medina-Murphy + Jennie Pekarne3258% gamesnot enough data
Jaime Hendricks + Gina Kinard033 matchesnot enough data
Jaime Hendricks + Pam Ferrell033 matchesnot enough data
Susan Calkins + Becky Kincaid213 matchesnot enough data
Gina Kinard + Pam Ferrell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becky Kincaid
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Calkins
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Jan Whittaker
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Jaime Hendricks
12W–23L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Leslie Crooker
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Vickie Degges
14W–22L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Gina Kinard
6W–20L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
Susan Sinclair
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Darci Gold
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.93
Pam Ferrell
2W–17L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.87
3
Beverly Burke
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Brenda MacFadden
8W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Monica Medina-Murphy
16W–21L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Jennie Pekarne
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.