Teams

Creager 40+ Night

2025 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Spring - HSV · 3.5 Women 40N1S3D

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-05vs Jackson/WilesLost 03
L#1 DoublesShannon Orr / Katherine Russell vs Irene Wisner / Sabine Newberry3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Gattis / Michelle Howell vs Elizabeth Minamitani / Janet Mmbaha6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusie Brock / Shannon Lindig vs Judy Wiles / Pamela Keller2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-05-05vs Jambor 3.5 40+Won 30
W#1 DoublesShannon Orr / Patti Gamble vs Lisa Pant / Allison Gregg6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShannon Lindig / Patty Laughlin vs Christine Mannor / Susan Jambor6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatherine Russell / Susie Brock vs Bonnie Maples / Velvet Hopkins6-0, 6-1
2025-05-04vs Perez Spring 25Lost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Crowe / Alicia Howard vs Melinda Anderson / Melissa Jose1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKatherine Russell vs Karen Zecher7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShannon Orr / Patti Gamble vs Brenda Perez / Wendy Brandon6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShannon Lindig / Patty Laughlin vs Lori Tillery / Debra Weaver2-6, 1-6
2025-04-09vs Jambor 3.5 40+Split 22
L#1 DoublesKatherine Russell / Elizabeth Sudderth vs Christine Mannor / LASHONDA SMITH2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShannon Lindig vs Marjorie Williams3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesShannon Orr / Tara Curry vs Rhonda Thompson / Deborah O'Malley6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Howell / Patty Laughlin vs Susan Jambor / Cindy Davis6-0, 6-1
2025-03-22vs Perez Spring 25Lost 04
L#1 DoublesJennifer Crowe / Alicia Howard vs Brenda Formby / Beth Wilbanks4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Condurso vs Andrea Stewart6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Gattis / Elizabeth Sudderth vs Connie Powell / Lori Tillery4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSusie Brock / Tara Curry vs Sylvia Dean / Debra Weaver3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 40N1S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Alicia Howard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Michelle Condurso
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.28
Patti Gamble
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Jennifer Crowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Libby Neill
published
3.17
Shannon Orr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Katherine Russell
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.14
Sheri Rustic
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Elizabeth Sudderth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Tara Curry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Shannon Lindig
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Cindy Gattis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Nora Vanderploeg
published
2.93
Ann Creager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Susie Brock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Patty Laughlin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Lindig + Sheri Rustic4264% games+11.5% vs expected
Sheri Rustic + Patty Laughlin14653% games+5.7% vs expected
Patti Gamble + Shannon Orr3448% games+4.4% vs expected
Ann Creager + Shannon Orr4648% games+0.4% vs expected
Patty Laughlin + Shannon Orr2345% games+0.0% vs expected
Cindy Gattis + Patty Laughlin1636% games−9.5% vs expected
Shannon Lindig + Shannon Orr1443% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Rustic + Nora Vanderploeg3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alicia Howard
59W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Michelle Condurso
46W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Patti Gamble
39W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Jennifer Crowe
24W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Libby Neill
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Shannon Orr
51W–67L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
Katherine Russell
54W–70L career · 14 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Sheri Rustic
110W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.14
Elizabeth Sudderth
20W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Tara Curry
9W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Shannon Lindig
95W–95L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
3.5
Cindy Gattis
7W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Nora Vanderploeg
58W–53L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
3
Ann Creager
23W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Susie Brock
27W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Patty Laughlin
38W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.