Teams

Arsenal

2025 18 & OVER SPRING Saturday Men · 3.5 MEN

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-10vs SHAVANO PIRATESWon 32
W#1 DoublesMatthew Vasquez / Raul Flores vs Ted Verrier / Calvin Morgan6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDavid Perales vs Steven Morfin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHayden Cobb / Ernesto Elizondo vs Scott Broderhausen / Matthew Muddiman6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRoland Deleon vs Sam Boykin6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Wood / Alex Ramirez vs Paul Cardenas / Curt Hippensteel5-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
David Perales
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Matt Rothrock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Matthew Vasquez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Giovanni DeGerolami
published
3.55
Joed Tague
published
3.53
Killian Corona
published
3.45
Daniel Casanova
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Hayden Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Kelly Parks
published
3.33
Alex Ramirez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Ernesto Elizondo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Roland Deleon
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gregg Campa
published
Tomas Rivera
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hayden Cobb + Kelly Parks4165% games+13.1% vs expected
Matt Rothrock + Daniel Casanova3251% gamesnot enough data
Giovanni DeGerolami + Joed Tague213 matchesnot enough data
Hayden Cobb + Ernesto Elizondo123 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Vasquez + Killian Corona303 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Parks + Alex Ramirez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Perales
31W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Matt Rothrock
17W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.64
Matthew Vasquez
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Giovanni DeGerolami
23W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Joed Tague
32W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
Killian Corona
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Daniel Casanova
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Hayden Cobb
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Kelly Parks
14W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Alex Ramirez
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Ernesto Elizondo
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Roland Deleon
31W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Enrique Casas Jimenez
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gregg Campa
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tomas Rivera
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.