Teams

IRMSL/Palma/40&Over4.0W

2023 IRMSL Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women-W 1

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-10vs Boulevard - HazeltonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela Ahmadi / Theresa Dubiel vs Mary Bowman / Kate Simpson6-7, 4-6
2023-05-03vs Nrs - AlbrechtLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandy Palma / Beth Daly vs Lisa Wigley / Sharon DeGaetano4-6, 1-6
2023-04-22vs Nrs - AlbrechtLost 02
L#2 DoublesLori Glaspey / Sandy Palma vs Ann Chauss / Anna Haman6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Dubiel / Bonnie Robinson vs Sharon DeGaetano / Susan Gore2-6, 0-6
2023-03-29vs Boulevard - HazeltonWon 10
W#3 DoublesPenny Boulden / Sandy Palma vs Kristin Hazelton / Patty Raby7-6, 6-2
2023-03-22vs Nrs - AlbrechtSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSandy Palma / Beth Daly vs Lynda Emilson / Sharon DeGaetano6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTheresa Dubiel / Marie-Paule Cafmeyer vs Grace Pillari / Sue Davis3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women-W 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Lori Glaspey
published
Angela Ahmadi
published 4
3.71
Regan Chatel
published
3.70
Sandy Palma
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Theresa Dubiel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Beth Daly
published 4
Elisabeth Smith
published
Penny Boulden
published
Tanya Mikel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Dubiel + Sandy Palma4353% gamesnot enough data
Penny Boulden + Sandy Palma213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Glaspey
13W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.81
4
Angela Ahmadi
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Regan Chatel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%6%94%
3.71
Sandy Palma
119W–104L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%8%92%
3.70
Theresa Dubiel
48W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Beth Daly
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Elisabeth Smith
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marie-Paule Cafmeyer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Penny Boulden
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tanya Mikel
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.