Teams

JWaleski (OPRC)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.28 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-31vs RVora/SMoon (Lifetime)Won 21
L#1 DoublesGeorgia Buck / Leah Hackworth vs Laura Pratt / Christina Prejean3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKathy Spence / Jimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Melissa Eccleston / Sun Moon6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlison Milas / Katie Nelson vs Reshma Vora / Olya Banchik6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-24vs MLGarrison (Sardis)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSusie Williams / Leah Hackworth vs Mary Laird Garrison / Meredith Heimburger1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJimena Lozano de Bermudez / Laura Irick vs Samantha Abbott / Starr Stroud6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGeorgia Buck / Lauren Davenport vs Emily Bass / Lauren Stout6-3, 6-1
2026-08-17vs VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Bauer / Leah Hackworth vs Loretta Anderson / Erin Pacilli6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJosey Waleski / Katie Nelson vs Suzanne Jones / Pattye Figman6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Irick / Annie Spanjers vs Leslie Gaylord / Vanessa Pomfrey6-1, 6-0
2026-08-03vs DCazorla (BCC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesGeorgia Buck / Annie Spanjers vs Nancy Scholz / Jennifer Ison3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCatherine Bauer / Alison Milas vs Kathleen Stepp / Sheri Newman6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Spence / Jimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Kristin Webster / Dori Cazorla6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Colleen Terschluse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.49
Susie Williams
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Catherine Bauer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Kathy Spence
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Laura Irick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Josey Waleski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Alison Milas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.08
Sarah Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Georgia Buck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Jimena Lozano de Bermudez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.01
Leah Hackworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Annie Spanjers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Virginia Papadopulos
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Lauren Davenport
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Hawkins + Susie Williams6161% games+21.8% vs expected
Alison Milas + Leah Hackworth6256% games+2.4% vs expected
Laura Irick + Josey Waleski8456% games−1.4% vs expected
Kathy Spence + Jimena Lozano de Bermudez6166% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Spence + Alison Milas1650% gamesnot enough data
Jimena Lozano de Bermudez + Alison Milas4162% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Spence + Josey Waleski314 matchesnot enough data
Josey Waleski + Alison Milas314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Colleen Terschluse
15W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Susie Williams
16W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.49
3.5
Catherine Bauer
18W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Kathy Spence
41W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Laura Irick
41W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Josey Waleski
67W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
3
Alison Milas
38W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.14
Sarah Hawkins
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.08
Georgia Buck
10W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Jimena Lozano de Bermudez
58W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Leah Hackworth
43W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Annie Spanjers
67W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
Virginia Papadopulos
10W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.83
Lauren Davenport
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.