Teams

EW-PFC-Jones

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 MEN

7 players · average NTRP 4.30 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-02vs E.W.-Free AgentsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeffery Urie / Kevin Jones vs Doug Conboy / John Cattell8-6
W#2 DoublesRob Knox / David Robin vs Kevin Tweed / Mark Jackson8-2
L#3 DoublesDuke Dixon / Curt Andersen vs Tim Qualls / Craig Fager0-1
2025-11-01vs E.W.-Free AgentsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeffery Urie / Rob Knox vs Kevin Tweed / Mark Jackson8-4
W#2 DoublesKevin Jones / Curt Andersen vs John Cattell / Craig Fager9-7
W#3 DoublesDavid Robin / Mark Villegas vs Glen Satre / Guy Schneider8-3
2025-11-01vs E.W.-Free AgentsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeffery Urie / Kevin Jones vs Kevin Tweed / Doug Conboy8-4
L#2 DoublesRob Knox / Mark Villegas vs Mark Jackson / Guy Schneider6-8
W#3 DoublesDuke Dixon / David Robin vs Craig Fager / Glen Satre2-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Jeffery Urie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
David Robin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.79
Mark Villegas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Kevin Jones
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.58
Curt Andersen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Duke Dixon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rob Knox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Jones + Jeffery Urie8264% games+21.4% vs expected
Jeffery Urie + David Robin18862% games+1.2% vs expected
Kevin Jones + Duke Dixon4252% gamesnot enough data
Curt Andersen + David Robin3260% gamesnot enough data
Rob Knox + Jeffery Urie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jeffery Urie
61W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
David Robin
74W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
4.14
4
Mark Villegas
26W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4.5
Kevin Jones
26W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.64
4
Curt Andersen
19W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Duke Dixon
22W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rob Knox
20W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.