← Teams

CHARB-Moreno

2021 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.81 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kris Kelly-Koster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
—
Roxanne Imbrie
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.68
Tony Moreno
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Lance Berkey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Donna Roisom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Tom Lonergan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Craig Mills
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Patricia Sturr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results9 ties
2021-06-20Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRoxanne Imbrie / Tony Moreno vs Jana Hirst / Michael Yee6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElaine Zevenbergen / Tom Lonergan vs Mary Sides / Perry Sides6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatricia Sturr / Lance Berkey vs Robby Lafleur / Martin McClanan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRoxanne Imbrie / Tony Moreno vs Flor Harrigan / Neil Soiffer4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElaine Zevenbergen / Tom Lonergan vs Donna Kennish / Eric Means4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesColleen Hamilton / Craig Mills vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-13Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesPatricia Sturr / Craig Mills vs Mark Dawkins / Denise Dawkins1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndy Pihl / Kris Kelly-Koster vs Kelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor6-3, 6-4
2021-06-12Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRoxanne Imbrie / Tony Moreno vs John Varner / RENEE VANDEGRIEND7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKris Kelly-Koster / Tom Lonergan vs Prasad Kenkaraseril / Karen Pickering7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDonna Roisom / Craig Mills vs Rick Wedan / Carol Chiu6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKris Kelly-Koster / Kevin Oloughlin vs JT Smith / Amiee Moyers6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRoxanne Imbrie / Tom Lonergan vs Peter Aleman / Denise Dawkins6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCraig Mills / Donna Roisom vs Everett Frank / Lisa Provost4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-30Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesRoxanne Imbrie / Andy Pihl vs Kristi Tompkins / Jeff Anhaltzer6-1, 6-4
2021-05-29Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesRoxanne Imbrie / Andy Pihl vs Sandi Martes / David Williams6-4, 6-2
2021-05-23Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesPatricia Sturr / Lance Berkey vs Terri Pickard / Bill Henderson0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKris Kelly-Koster / Tony Moreno vs Sally Lovett / Tony Humpage6-1, 6-2
2021-05-22Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesPatricia Sturr / Lance Berkey vs Katherine Kralj / Robert Ferek6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRoxanne Imbrie / Tony Moreno vs Liz DelPlato / Scott Eliason6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Roisom / Craig Mills vs Penny Birkhofer / Dave Vinik7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kris Kelly-Koster
79W–101L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
Roxanne Imbrie
46W–44L career
not enough data
—
4
Tony Moreno
309W–153L career
2%98%0%
3.68
4
Lance Berkey
59W–40L career
3%97%0%
3.68
4
Donna Roisom
100W–85L career
9%91%0%
3.63
3.5
Tom Lonergan
104W–99L career
0%87%13%
3.47
3.5
Craig Mills
58W–89L career
0%91%9%
3.42
3.5
Patricia Sturr
59W–77L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.