Teams

SFV-Kill Shots/Olivia Burtis & Kate Pyle

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 SFV Fall WE · SFV 18 WEEKEND - Women 4.5

21 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SFV 18 WEEKEND - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Angela Caldwell
published 4.5
4.40
Chandler Nguyen
published 4.5
4.38
Lisa Novajosky
published
4.31
Kelly Kenney
published
Cheryl Park
published 4.5
4.24
Shanna Reznik
published
4.21
Felicity Flesher
published 4.5
4.19
Vicky Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Alexandra Kleinman
published 4.5
4.17
Gloria Geller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Kumhui Feindler
published
4.05
Carrie Kisker
published 4.5
3.97
Lily Wu
published
3.96
Megan Colligan
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.96
Trish Halamandaris
published
3.91
Olivia Burtis
published
3.89
Katherine Pyle
published
3.87
Jill Bauman
published
3.85
3.61
Nilou Panahpour
published
Julie Juliani
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trish Halamandaris + Katherine Pyle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angela Caldwell
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Chandler Nguyen
18W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.40
Lisa Novajosky
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.38
Kelly Kenney
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Cheryl Park
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shanna Reznik
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Felicity Flesher
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Vicky Blanco
131W–100L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Alexandra Kleinman
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Gloria Geller
139W–102L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
4.17
Kumhui Feindler
58W–36L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Carrie Kisker
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
Lily Wu
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
4
Megan Colligan
174W–69L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
Trish Halamandaris
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.96
Olivia Burtis
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.91
Katherine Pyle
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.89
Jill Bauman
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Amanda Richardson
30W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Nilou Panahpour
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Julie Juliani
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.