Teams

Kulas

2021 VA Beach Adult 18 & Over Tennis Patrons · VA Beach Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-08vs HalterLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristina Chastain vs Jen Lagow6-7, 6-7
2021-05-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Kulas / Beth Skolnick vs Trina Burgess / Kathleen Kern6-2, 6-1
2021-05-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesKristina Chastain vs Adela Roxas6-2, 6-4
2021-05-04vs HalterSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKristina Chastain vs Sandra Savino6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Kulas / Erica Ashcraft vs Joyce Howell / Judy Jackson6-7, 3-6
2021-04-13vs BurgessWon 20
W#1 SinglesKristina Chastain vs Kelly Long6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBeth Kulas / Caroline Willcox vs Denise Makowski / Chrissy Sokol6-2, 7-5
2021-04-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBeth Kulas / Nicole Perkins vs Patricia Jackson / Traci Corcoran5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for VA Beach Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Dillon Yost
published 4.5
3.76
Suzanne Mihlon
published
3.42
Kristina Chastain
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.42
Nicole Perkins
published
3.34
Beth Skolnick
published 3.5
3.29
Beth Kulas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.17
Janet Brashear
published
3.17
Caroline Willcox
published 3.5
2.99
2.93
Erica Ashcraft
published 3
2.65
Bonnie Green
published 3
Lizanne Harris
published
Yalonda Yost
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Skolnick + Beth Kulas3353% gamesnot enough data
Beth Kulas + Kristina Chastain224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dillon Yost
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
4.21
Suzanne Mihlon
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
3.5
Kristina Chastain
65W–43L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
Nicole Perkins
15W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Beth Skolnick
14W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Beth Kulas
78W–73L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
Janet Brashear
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Caroline Willcox
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Anne Marie Burroughs
3W–12L career · no lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Erica Ashcraft
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Bonnie Green
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
2.65
Lizanne Harris
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Yalonda Yost
4W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.