Teams

Pa.Vickers18S

2024 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-16vs Br.Kohan18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesPatrick Vickers vs Jody Anderson6-3, 6-2
2024-10-09vs Br.McLean18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesRyan Catrine vs Michael Gee7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJosh Dellinger vs Brian Pickett6-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesPatrick Vickers vs Jay Williams6-3, 6-4
2024-09-25vs Jo.Hastings18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesRyan Catrine vs Josh Hastings6-7, 4-6
2024-09-18vs Ro.Harris18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesRyan Catrine vs Patrick Dougherty6-2, 6-0
2024-09-11vs Br.Kohan18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesRyan Catrine vs Brendan OConnor6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesPatrick Vickers vs Stephen Mungenast5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAustin Council vs Ryan Wilborne6-0, 6-1
2024-09-04vs Jo.Williamson18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesRyan Catrine vs Nishant Nayudu6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJosh Dellinger vs Elliott Blades6-1, 6-0
2024-08-28vs De.Farmer18S3.0Split 11
W#1 SinglesJosh Dellinger vs Ra Yasin6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAustin Council vs Paul Sherman4-6, 2-6
2024-08-21vs Br.McLean18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesRyan Catrine vs Bruce Farrell6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Ryan Catrine
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
3.08
Josh Dellinger
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.06
Austin Council
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.96
Patrick Vickers
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.50
Adam Daniels
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Vickers + Josh Dellinger92142% games−12.1% vs expected
Josh Dellinger + Austin Council3549% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Vickers + Austin Council3259% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Vickers + Ryan Catrine213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ryan Catrine
56W–36L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.20
3
Josh Dellinger
77W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Austin Council
45W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Patrick Vickers
62W–85L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Adam Daniels
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.