Teams

Silver

2025 CVTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-28vs CVTA/Millie MorganLost 03
L#1 DoublesRegina Drummond / Connie Quinn vs Valerie Hopper / Abby Hastings0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniele Gee / Kristie Teasley vs Sarah Cargle / Ronna Sabino1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Silver / Sandra Copeland vs Joanna Fife / Carissa Richardson1-6, 2-6
2025-04-01vs CVTA/Millie MorganLost 04
L#1 DoublesRegina Drummond / Kristie Teasley vs Ronna Sabino / Millie Morgan0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Ragland vs Kate Smith2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Banta / Connie Quinn vs Abby Hastings / Valerie Hopper1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDaniele Gee / Tina Waggoner vs Sarah Cargle / Kathleen Wolfe0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Kristie Teasley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Lori Patch
published
2.54
Regina Drummond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Vivian White
published
2.50
Connie Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.42
Rebecca Silver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Rachel Ragland
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.35
Meredith Banta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Daniele Gee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.19
2.07
Tina Waggoner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.07
Sandra Copeland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Regina Drummond + Kristie Teasley1435% gamesnot enough data
Lori Patch + Meredith Banta3261% gamesnot enough data
Vivian White + Lori Patch134 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Banta + Connie Quinn044 matchesnot enough data
Vivian White + Sandra Copeland213 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Copeland + Tina Waggoner033 matchesnot enough data
Kristie Teasley + Lori Patch303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristie Teasley
17W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Lori Patch
44W–54L career · no lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.59
Regina Drummond
5W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
Vivian White
22W–30L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Connie Quinn
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Rebecca Silver
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
Rachel Ragland
10W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40
Meredith Banta
16W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
0%87%13%
2.35
2.5
Daniele Gee
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Terrell-Payne
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Tina Waggoner
0W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Sandra Copeland
7W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.