Teams

FCCC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 4.43 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-30vs CSU WHITEWon 10
W#1 DoublesDennis Crow / Christopher Fox vs Scott Bolton / Jeff Keepman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-23vs CSU GOLDLost 01
L#1 DoublesDennis Crow / Todd Kooi vs Elijah Henley / Roy Foster2-6, 6-7
2023-05-16vs LVTA NAVYLost 01
L#1 SinglesChristian Bachelet vs Christian Muna6-7, 4-6
2023-05-09vs CSU GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDennis Crow / Brian Krueger vs Nik Bjelland-Miller / Michael Wagner6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesChristian Bachelet vs Adam Byrne6-7, 4-6
2023-05-02vs HMTC SILVERWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Fox / Dennis Crow vs Wes Marlan / Scott Schaffer6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-25vs CSU WHITEWon 10
W#3 DoublesTom Weller / Dennis Crow vs Michael Dirvonas / Zac Wyse4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-04-18vs CSU GOLDWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristian Bachelet / Tom Weller vs Vikram Patil / Royce Grover6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Dennis Crow
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.33
Shawn Farnell
published 4.5
4.31
Christopher Fox
published 4.5
Branko Banic
published 4.5
4.21
Ryan Selby
published 4.5
4.13
Tom Weller
published
4.12
Bill Bruschke
published 4.5
3.91
Christian Bachelet
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.90
Ken Kawakami
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Selby + Shawn Farnell9160% games+7.5% vs expected
Ryan Selby + Dennis Crow404 matchesnot enough data
Shawn Farnell + Dennis Crow134 matchesnot enough data
Dennis Crow + Christopher Fox314 matchesnot enough data
Branko Banic + Christopher Fox303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dennis Crow
36W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
4.41
4.5
Shawn Farnell
58W–59L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Christopher Fox
26W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
4.31
4.5
Branko Banic
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Ryan Selby
43W–17L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.21
Tom Weller
12W–16L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.13
4.5
Bill Bruschke
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Christian Bachelet
47W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.91
Ken Kawakami
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.