Teams

BC-MCC/LeasaIreland

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

24 players · average NTRP 4.06 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Bre Kelleher
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.05
Jayme Hardwick
published
3.88
Kristina Schrader
published
3.86
Elizabeth Shelor
published
3.78
3.77
Carrie Arsenault
published 4
3.77
Denise Towsley
published 4
Becky Anzivino
published 4
3.74
Heidi Nelson
published
3.73
Serene Peterson
published
3.71
Leasa Ireland
published
3.70
Kelli Spriggs
published
3.68
Kristen Finn
published
3.67
Jhoanna Torres
published
3.64
Amanda Kresser
published 4
3.64
Kris Rone
published 4
3.63
Frances Hong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Bernice Lake
published 4
3.47
Mandy Stepanovich
published
3.45
Mojgan Vakili
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Jill Halkias
published
3.32
Ivy Charlton
published
JoAnn Totzke
published
MaryAnn Burns
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bre Kelleher
67W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
Jayme Hardwick
70W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
4.05
Kristina Schrader
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Elizabeth Shelor
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Anne Marie Leonard
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Carrie Arsenault
65W–33L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Denise Towsley
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Becky Anzivino
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Heidi Nelson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Serene Peterson
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Leasa Ireland
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Kelli Spriggs
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Kristen Finn
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Jhoanna Torres
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Amanda Kresser
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
4
Kris Rone
71W–60L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
4
Frances Hong
74W–93L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Bernice Lake
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
Mandy Stepanovich
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Mojgan Vakili
80W–39L career · 6 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Jill Halkias
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.36
Ivy Charlton
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
JoAnn Totzke
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
MaryAnn Burns
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.