Teams

Rutledge/LR/Rebs

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-01-12vs Clark/LR/RebsWon 10
W#2 SinglesKatie Rutledge vs Christa Clark6-1, 6-1
2026-01-06vs Junior/LR/RebLost 01
L#1 SinglesKatie Rutledge vs Kelsy Knox0-6, 1-6
2025-12-18vs Bartlett/Sherwood/STCLost 03
L#1 SinglesMicah Shaver vs Chanda Price4-6, 4-5
L#2 SinglesAbigail Obana vs Casey Bartlett1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJonna Clark vs Michelle Bruzatori2-6, 0-6
2025-12-11Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKatie Rutledge vs Sydney Ross1-6, 2-6
2025-12-11vs Virden/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 SinglesSara Jennings vs Anne Virden6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJonna Clark vs Paige Shields3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMicah Shaver vs Wendy Dawson3-6, 2-6
2025-12-10vs Gillispie/LR/RebsLost 02
L#1 SinglesSara Jennings vs Kathy Wild6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAbigail Obana vs Jessica Buchman1-6, 0-6
2025-12-04vs Brown/LR/RebLost 01
L#1 SinglesKatie Rutledge vs Dorian Craft1-6, 0-6
2025-12-04vs Bulmanski/LR/PVCCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJonna Clark vs Amanda Bledsoe6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAbigail Obana vs Sophie Brandt0-6, 0-6
2025-11-12vs Webster/Conway/RebsLost 03
L#1 SinglesBrandilyn Morris vs Anna Coon3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSara Jennings vs Amy Webster1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAbigail Obana vs Emily Hancock2-6, 0-6
2025-11-11vs Doose/Jones/LR/RebsLost 01
L#1 SinglesKatie Rutledge vs Anne McPherson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-11-03vs Duff/LR/BPLost 01
L#1 SinglesKatie Rutledge vs Regina Maher6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Katie Rutledge
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.40
Brandilyn Morris
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Sara Jennings
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
1.86
Abigail Obana
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Jonna Clark
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Micah Shaver
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Rutledge
20W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
2.5
Brandilyn Morris
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
Sara Jennings
6W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Abigail Obana
2W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Jonna Clark
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Micah Shaver
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.