← Teams

CAC-Morales

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.79 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Tim Luangrath
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Dave Vinik
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.53
Robert Ferek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Tony Khamsouk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.31
Jim Wheeler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Bruce Yang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Len Morales
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Kelly Woodard
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 0
Results9 ties
2019-09-27Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesBruce Yang / Liz DelPlato vs Maria Kosmetatos / Patrick Harkin6-2, 6-4
2019-06-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRobert Ferek / Jim Wheeler vs Jaap Sparrius / Neal Burgstahler7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDave Vinik vs Michael Chang6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesThomas Lockhart / Tony Khamsouk vs Mark Stephenson / John McCroskey7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2019-06-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMichael Moore / Kelly Woodard vs Tony Moreno / Carlin Jackson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDave Vinik vs Tom Lonergan6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBruce Yang / George Young vs Russ DeMoss / Randy Nicholson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2019-06-22Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesDave Vinik vs Franco Rosete6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJim Wheeler / Kelly Woodard vs Zachary Kinavey / Jack Hughes0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2019-06-09Lost 2–3
L#1 DoublesJim Wheeler / Bill Adams vs Carlin Jackson / Tony Moreno2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDave Vinik vs Ahmed Abouelseoud6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Lockhart / Bruce Yang vs Russ DeMoss / Randy Nicholson7-6, 7-6
L#2 SinglesTony Khamsouk vs Steve Carns6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLen Morales / Kelly Woodard vs Adam Hutchinson / Brian Rinker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2019-06-01Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLen Morales / Tim Luangrath vs William Weber / Justin Shull6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDave Vinik vs Howard Jaffe6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTony Khamsouk / George Young vs Alan Kaplan / Paul Garry6-4, 6-3
2019-05-18Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesRobert Ferek / Tony Khamsouk vs Agus Rusli / Charles Taguet6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLen Morales / Tim Luangrath vs Patrick Maginnis / Kevin Heller6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJim Wheeler vs Vincent Lee6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKelly Woodard / Bruce Yang vs Danny Denning / Jeffrey Jackson6-1, 6-1
2019-05-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesTony Khamsouk / Tim Luangrath vs Ben Jacobson / Tuan Truong7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDave Vinik vs John Hall6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Ferek / Michael Moore vs Robert Torch / James Hockley6-4, 6-1
2019-04-27Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesJim Wheeler / Tony Khamsouk vs Kelly Robertson / Paul Garry6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDave Vinik vs Howard Jaffe7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLen Morales / Kelly Woodard vs Michael Mayer / Chris Johnson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGeorge Young / Tim Luangrath vs Neil Soiffer / Mickey Brivic3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Tim Luangrath
13W–35L career
7%92%0%
3.66
4
Dave Vinik
79W–84L career
6%94%0%
3.66
4
Robert Ferek
75W–92L career
27%73%0%
3.53
4
Tony Khamsouk
49W–115L career
37%63%0%
3.49
3.5
Jim Wheeler
60W–69L career
0%98%1%
3.31
3.5
Bruce Yang
33W–74L career
1%98%1%
3.28
3.5
Len Morales
43W–69L career
8%92%0%
3.17
0
Kelly Woodard
25W–38L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.