Teams

Martin

2025 Combo 18 & Over- Knoxville · 7.5 Women Combo Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-04vs KnoxHall18Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCynthia Reed / Amanda Smith vs Lauren Hall / Leigh Henderson1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Brady / Mary Hutchinson vs Brooke Williams / Emily Elison1-6, 3-6
2025-09-23vs Unger/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesElena Burns / Amanda Mize vs Deanna Unger / Paola Martinez2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Lea / Stacey Wright vs Brittany Epperly / Allison King3-6, 1-6
2025-08-26vs KnoxHall18Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRobyn Raley / Ann Brady vs Victoria Sissom / Leigh Henderson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Simpson / Amanda Mize vs Brooke Williams / Emily Elison4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElena Burns / Amanda Smith vs Lauren Heinrich / Roseanne Gardner6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-09vs HurleyLost 02
L#2 DoublesAmanda Mize / Ann Brady vs Jasmine Dabbs / Rosa Luttrell0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStacey Wright / Mary Walton vs Janene Nordin / Jennifer Collins1-6, 1-6
2025-08-06vs Unger/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesTammy Simpson / Jennifer Lea vs Laura Spurgin / Erin Upshaw6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Hutchinson / Amanda Mize vs Deanna Unger / Paola Martinez0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStacey Wright / Donna Walker vs HAILEY NEDS / Allison King0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Robyn Raley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Tammy Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Elena Burns
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Jennifer Lea
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Amanda Mize
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Cynthia Reed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Stacey Wright
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Ann Brady
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Michelle Wakefield
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Raley + Tammy Simpson5253% games−2.2% vs expected
Amanda Mize + Jennifer Lea134 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Mize + Ann Brady123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robyn Raley
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Tammy Simpson
18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.59
Elena Burns
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Jennifer Lea
11W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Amanda Mize
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cynthia Reed
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
Stacey Wright
6W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
Ann Brady
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.96
Michelle Wakefield
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.