Teams

Fair Oaks Highly Strung

2022 40 & OVER WEEKEND WOMEN · 3.5 Women Saturday

16 players · average NTRP 3.58 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Eileen Vogt
published 4
3.74
Diana Rendon
published 4
3.46
Kathy Burkholder
published
3.36
Yvonne Uhl
published
3.34
Lisa Bond
published
3.31
Michelle Pettit
published
3.29
Paula Sachse
published
3.27
Kelly Horne
published
3.27
Patty Dellocono
published
3.26
Debbie Starks
published 3.5
3.25
Jada Williams
published 3.5
3.23
Maryann Bateman
published
3.09
Deana Wilson
published 3
3.09
Kelly Grossman
published
3.09
Cassie Villegas
published 3.5
2.59
Melissa Crank
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Grossman + Michelle Pettit4451% games+3.2% vs expected
Debbie Starks + Kelly Horne3649% games+0.1% vs expected
Kathy Burkholder + Yvonne Uhl4452% games−2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eileen Vogt
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Diana Rendon
4W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Kathy Burkholder
28W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
Yvonne Uhl
27W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.36
Lisa Bond
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
Michelle Pettit
31W–20L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Paula Sachse
27W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Kelly Horne
36W–26L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Patty Dellocono
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Debbie Starks
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Jada Williams
18W–35L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Maryann Bateman
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Deana Wilson
12W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
Kelly Grossman
12W–24L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Cassie Villegas
0W–13L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Melissa Crank
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.