Teams

HANSEN 8.0 18+MX W23

2023 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 8.0 Mx

16 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-02-24vs Ewen 8.0 18+MX W23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPerri Anderson / Alejandro Trevino vs Sarah Johnson / Brendon Sebring3-6, 3-6
2023-02-17vs Renneisen 8.0 18+MX W23Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlejandro Trevino / Beci Bjornson vs Rachael Nazy / Pete Nazy4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-02-03vs Estey 8.0 18+MX W23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristine Paul / Alejandro Trevino vs Cristina Kazda / Sean Zindren3-6, 4-6
2023-01-27vs REILING/STOUT 8.0 18+MX W23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPerri Anderson / Alejandro Trevino vs Kathy Sommers / Leif Johnson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mx have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Perri Anderson
published
4.16
Beci Bjornson
published 4.5
4.14
Dana Hansen
published 4.5
4.00
Stacy Katsiyiannis
published
3.95
Pamela Moeller
published
3.93
Nicole Lechner
published
3.87
Ramji Kamakoti
published
3.81
Lisa Ogren
published
3.80
Benjamin Colburn
published 4
3.49
Sarah Curfman
published
3.46
Kristine Paul
published
3.37
Richard Lassow
published
3.17
Alejandro Trevino
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Josh Bliss
published
Nicholas Fisher
published
Roshan Rajkumar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beci Bjornson + Richard Lassow6254% games+0.9% vs expected
Lisa Ogren + Benjamin Colburn224 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Lechner + Benjamin Colburn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Perri Anderson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Beci Bjornson
17W–21L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Dana Hansen
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
4.14
Stacy Katsiyiannis
65W–41L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
Pamela Moeller
11W–26L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
Nicole Lechner
46W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.93
Ramji Kamakoti
26W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
Lisa Ogren
22W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Benjamin Colburn
41W–64L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
Sarah Curfman
58W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kristine Paul
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.46
Richard Lassow
25W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Alejandro Trevino
221W–280L career · 9 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Josh Bliss
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicholas Fisher
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roshan Rajkumar
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.