Teams

Smith Southwest

2024 Mixed 18 & Over-SW · 4.0 Mixed

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-28vs BerryLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeffie Blake Smith / Alex Lea vs Taylor Berry / Brennan Miller2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Lowery / Bryton Hixson vs Kimberly McNeese / Josh Iles7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-15vs BerryWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Nelson / Carolyn Stephens vs Diane Hay / Josh Iles3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesReilly Miller / Mary Miller vs Brennan Miller / Kimberly McNeese6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-08vs BerryWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Nelson / Carolyn Stephens vs Meredith Miller / Josh Iles6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeffie Blake Smith / Alex Lea vs Kimberly McNeese / Brennan Miller6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesReilly Miller / Mary Miller vs Taylor Berry / Joel Duff6-1, 6-3
2024-06-27vs BerrySplit 11
L#1 DoublesBryton Hixson / Mary Miller vs Josh Iles / Diane Hay3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJeffie Blake Smith / Alex Lea vs Meredith Miller / Cory Lambert6-3, 6-3
2024-06-10vs BerryLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Watts / Jeffie Blake Smith vs Taylor Berry / Brennan Miller2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesReilly Miller / Mary Miller vs Diane Hay / Josh Iles3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Nelson / Carolyn Stephens vs Meredith Miller / Cory Lambert6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Carolyn Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Alex Lea
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.65
Heather Watts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Bryton Hixson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Jeffie Blake Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Reilly Miller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffie Blake Smith + Alex Lea213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Stephens
29W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Alex Lea
16W–6L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Heather Watts
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Bryton Hixson
46W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jeffie Blake Smith
13W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Reilly Miller
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.