Teams

SGV Hot Tub Tennis Club-Nowacki-WN/TBD

2025 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-06vs SGV Arcadia Aces-Li-Arcadia-Sa3/5Lost 14
L#1 DoublesMoira Demos / Noanie Rofoli vs Julia Arnold / Sabrina Chang2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTina Lu vs Su Li4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Park / Sandra Rachild vs Esther Fernandez / Jessica Chan4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMarisa Oh vs Sydney Angrand7-6, 4-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWilda Pong / Deborah Beveridge vs Maya Joko / Gloria Cardoza1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesNoanie Rofoli / Cristina Siruno vs Kaihong Su / Jane Lee6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKathleen Makarewicz vs Ami Sin6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMoira Demos / Aimee Devaul vs Sandra Liu / Stacey McCarroll6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTina Lu vs Tiffany Sin6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShana Lutker / Deborah Beveridge vs Sherlyn Burns / Melicia Shen3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMarisa Oh / Aimee Devaul vs Megumi Kodama / Guiselle Gonzalez1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAndrea Wong vs Ariana Garcia6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDeborah Beveridge / Janice Park vs Adriana Higuera / Vanessa Vanda1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesNalini Arora vs Corinda Hayes2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWilda Pong / Shana Lutker vs Lisa Santana / Efe Oghoghome1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Andrea Wong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Kimberly Ndombe
published
2.86
Kiera Nowacki
published
2.80
Jayme Magallanes
published
2.68
Sandra Rachild
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Candice Wu
published 3
2.62
Noanie Rofoli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Cristina Siruno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Marisa Oh
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Nalini Arora
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.57
Tina Lu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.56
Moira Demos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Aimee Devaul
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Shana Lutker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Kerry Tribe
published
2.20
Deborah Beveridge
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Janice Park
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Makarewicz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Margo Victor
published
Wilda Pong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Makarewicz + Aimee Devaul213 matchesnot enough data
Aimee Devaul + Moira Demos123 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Tribe + Shana Lutker033 matchesnot enough data
Noanie Rofoli + Moira Demos033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Wong
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Kimberly Ndombe
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Kiera Nowacki
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Jayme Magallanes
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Sandra Rachild
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%10%90%
2.68
3
Candice Wu
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
Noanie Rofoli
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Cristina Siruno
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Marisa Oh
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Nalini Arora
4W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Tina Lu
23W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
Moira Demos
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Aimee Devaul
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.56
Shana Lutker
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Kerry Tribe
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Deborah Beveridge
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Janice Park
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Makarewicz
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Margo Victor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wilda Pong
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.