Teams

Eagle Harbor - Williams

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Men · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-15vs Williams Y - MulveMeleWon 31
W#1 DoublesRay Williams / Michael Rouse vs Craig Mele / David Weinand7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNeal McDaniel vs Thomas Stephen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLarry Davidow / Jeffrey Budde vs David Drill / Gary Gray6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChristopher Lane / Raja David vs Mark Cabler / Louis Posick4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Larry Davidow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Tim Hackett
published
3.47
Mike Bruno
published
3.37
Neal McDaniel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Ray Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Lucien Abboud
published
3.35
Jim Pinkerman
published
3.33
Jeffrey Budde
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Craig Bilyeu
published 3.5
3.31
Michael Rouse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Glen Godwin
published
3.29
Raja David
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
David Phillips
published 3.5
3.20
Adam Mercer
published 3.5
3.16
Christopher Lane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Phillips + Mike Bruno4353% gamesnot enough data
Raja David + Christopher Lane0534% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Larry Davidow
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Tim Hackett
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Mike Bruno
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Neal McDaniel
11W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Ray Williams
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Lucien Abboud
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Jim Pinkerman
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Jeffrey Budde
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Craig Bilyeu
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Michael Rouse
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Glen Godwin
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Raja David
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
David Phillips
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Adam Mercer
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Christopher Lane
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.