Teams

BC-LLW-BillieJeanKingTC/JoGarrett

2021 SCTA DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-05vs BC-Kramer/DonnaAshcraftLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Ashley Cruse vs Akiko Cohen / Gemma Lokier5-7, 5-7
2021-11-21vs BC-SouthEnd/ColleenJohnsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Chloe Kishel vs Aileen Kizlinski / Kimberly Jones6-2, 6-2
2021-10-31vs BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderianWon 10
W#1 DoublesJenniffer Wong / Lena Loha vs Angelica Ramos / Grace Day6-3, 6-0
2021-10-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesJenniffer Wong / Tammy Vuong vs Georgia Ferrigno / Kathy Holcomb6-0, 6-0
2021-10-23vs BC-PalosVerdesTC/BonniYingWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Chloe Kishel vs Rebecca Sommerstein / Tricia Rapaport6-2, 6-1
2021-10-17vs BC-AltaVista/LynetteCampbellWon 20
W#1 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Chloe Kishel vs Mukti Patel / Amberlee Baugus6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTammy Vuong / Jenniffer Wong vs Kathie Papera / Jessica Sykora6-2, 6-2
2021-10-03vs BC-MCC/AmySchmargenWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Rasmussen / Chloe Kishel vs Robin Terry / Taylor Rayfield6-4, 6-4
2021-09-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesJosephine Garrett / Terri Rasmussen vs Kimberlee Kelly / Jen Hall6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Chloe Kishel
published 4.5
3.75
Terri Rasmussen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Josephine Garrett
published
3.36
Beejell Soco
published 3.5
3.36
Katherine Wong
published
3.36
Karla Padova
published
3.34
Jenniffer Wong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Tammy Vuong
published
3.18
Terri Norman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenniffer Wong + Tammy Vuong213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chloe Kishel
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
4.14
4
Terri Rasmussen
136W–90L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Josephine Garrett
7W–19L career · no lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Beejell Soco
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.36
Katherine Wong
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.36
Karla Padova
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Jenniffer Wong
200W–169L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
Tammy Vuong
16W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.34
Terri Norman
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.