Teams

YMCA:Gilman

2021-22 NH Tri Level · Men 3.0-2021

3 players · average NTRP / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-10-31vs YMCA:BrentLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarc Gilman / Andrew McMillan vs Albert So / Matthew Grote2-6, 5-7
2021-10-13vs YMCA:BrentLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarc Gilman / Andrew McMillan vs Matthew Grote / Nick Mueller0-6, 2-6
2021-10-06vs YMCA:BrentLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarc Gilman / Marc Amiet vs James Brent / Nick Mueller1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 3.0-2021
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YMCA:Brent3030013
2YMCA:Gilman0303637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew McMillan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marc Amiet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marc Gilman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Andrew McMillan
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marc Amiet
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Marc Gilman
0W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.