Teams

Thomas-CC

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall · Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-19vs Miller-GILost 13
L#1 DoublesPamela Thomas / Amy Hayes vs Brooke McLemore Trevathan / Britt Pyle1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSamantha Welch vs Emma Mudge0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Fleming / Connor Harbin vs Leigh Kosobucki / Lori Greeff6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKristi Scott / Jean Fuller vs Susan Evans / Laurie Brinegar6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-12vs Brown/Johnson-CCLost 04
L#1 DoublesJoylene Coker / Pamela Thomas vs Canita Johnson / Pearlie Jenkins5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Fleming vs Claudia Smith2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesConnor Harbin / Samantha Welch vs Luz Eaton / Alicia William2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKristi Scott / Jean Fuller vs Debra Kirksey / Cheryl DeYoung6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-05vs McRae-GILost 14
L#1 DoublesJoylene Coker / Alicia Weitzel vs Lena Weaver / Carson Laye0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Fleming vs Candra McRae0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Thomas / Connor Harbin vs Gloria Shayne / Tara Tyler3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSamantha Welch vs Ali Cichos1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKristi Scott / Jean Fuller vs Debbie Harris / Kimberly Udy6-2, 6-0
2024-10-04vs CORTA/Dayna JohnsonLost 04
L#1 DoublesAlicia Weitzel / Joylene Coker vs Alix Toelle / Victoria McKernan0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Fleming vs Jennifer Chancey0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKristi Scott / Connor Harbin vs Sandy Galliher / Giovanna Guerra-Troche1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJean Fuller / Samantha Welch vs Misty Carroll / Kymberly Ellison1-6, 0-6
2024-09-28vs Black-CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlicia Weitzel / Kristi Scott vs Stephanie Broom / Sophi Black6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJoylene Coker vs Laura Schneider1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSamantha Welch / Taylor Bruhn vs Kelly Webb / Brandy Sipling1-6, 0-6
2024-09-17vs Chancellor-CCCLost 14
L#1 DoublesKristi Scott / Alicia Weitzel vs Laura Lee / Cortney Douglas2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Fleming vs Kathleen Chancellor1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Thomas / Joylene Coker vs Mary Angela McMurphy / Sarah Cummings3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSamantha Welch vs Lindsay Mclaurin0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Hayes / Connor Harbin vs Selwyn Kelley / Aminta Flowers7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2024-09-07vs White/Timmons-CCLost 13
L#1 DoublesJean Fuller / Samantha Welch vs Andrea Bingham / Judith Hill0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoylene Coker / Pamela Thomas vs Niki Gedroic / Julie Sway3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesRebecca Fleming vs Angela Byrd6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristi Scott / Amy Hayes vs Alison Stiff / Lavivian Stewart1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Lauren Rodriguez
published
Amy Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Joylene Coker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Kristi Scott
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.53
Connor Harbin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.47
Rebecca Fleming
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
2.43
Jean Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.22
Alicia Weitzel
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Pamela Thomas
published
Samantha Welch
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Taylor Bruhn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Fuller + Kristi Scott2540% games−11.5% vs expected
Joylene Coker + Connor Harbin314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Rodriguez
34W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Amy Hayes
3W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joylene Coker
30W–79L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Kristi Scott
8W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
2.5
Connor Harbin
14W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%42%58%
2.53
Rebecca Fleming
52W–67L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.47
Jean Fuller
5W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.43
2.5
Alicia Weitzel
6W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.22
Pamela Thomas
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Welch
0W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Bruhn
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.