Teams

KY/LOU/WILLIAMS/DEHNER

2025 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER · 3.5 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-03vs KY/LOU/MORRISLost 01
L#1 SinglesAbigail Stewart vs Hannah Hardy5-7, 3-6
2025-08-18vs KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLDWon 20
W#1 SinglesAshley Dehner vs Kathleen Renda6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMary Kate Shain vs Mandy Yackey6-4, 6-1
2025-08-14vs KY/LOU/LOUISWon 21
W#1 SinglesAshley Dehner vs Priscilla Finley6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAbigail Stewart vs Bichai Zheng6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJina Kang vs Julianne Powell-Sutton3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-08-06vs KY/LOU//UNDERHILLLost 12
L#1 SinglesShelby Russell vs Morgan Robertson2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMary Kate Shain vs Abbey Heird6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJina Kang vs Joanna Agin2-6, 4-6
2025-07-29vs KY/LOU/MORRISSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAbigail Stewart vs Hannah Hardy4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAlexandra Deal vs Allison Morris6-0, 6-1
2025-07-17vs KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLDWon 10
W#1 SinglesAmanda Penn vs Bridgette Gorman6-4, 6-1
2025-07-09vs KY/LOU/LOUISWon 20
W#1 SinglesShelby Russell vs Katherine Louis6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAbigail Stewart vs Julianne Powell-Sutton6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Amanda Penn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Ashley Dehner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Abigail Stewart
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Shelby Russell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.29
Mary Kate Shain
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Alexandra Deal
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Jina Kang
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Penn + Mary Kate Shain303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Penn
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Ashley Dehner
32W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Abigail Stewart
19W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Shelby Russell
33W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Mary Kate Shain
23W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Alexandra Deal
20W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jina Kang
20W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.