Teams

Farris/Isom

2026 Lubbock Adult Mixed League 18 & Over · 9.0 Adult Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-15vs Aranda/BolesLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Starck / Carson Bolton vs Nathanael Boles / Chrystal Nickol Aranda6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMel McRee / Shannon Isom vs Jack Williams / Mia Gonzalez7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTrevor Paradoski / Hannah Quick vs Whitney Rose Farquhar / Ian McDonald1-6, 1-6
2026-07-08vs Aranda/BolesLost 02
L#1 DoublesTrevor Paradoski / Melissa Starck vs Ian McDonald / Whitney Rose Farquhar7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Farris / Amy Gandy vs Nathanael Boles / Mia Gonzalez6-7, 2-6
2026-07-01vs Aranda/BolesLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Starck / Trevor Paradoski vs Mia Gonzalez / Nathanael Boles2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Isom / Mel McRee vs Chrystal Nickol Aranda / Ian McDonald3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHannah Quick / Thomas Farris vs Gracelyn Anderson / Jack Williams1-6, 6-7
2026-06-24vs Aranda/BolesLost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Farris / Hannah Quick vs Jack Williams / Chrystal Nickol Aranda3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarson Bolton / Amy Gandy vs Ian McDonald / Gracelyn Anderson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMel McRee / Shannon Isom vs Nathanael Boles / Whitney Rose Farquhar2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Carson Bolton
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.42
Mel McRee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.30
Trevor Paradoski
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.13
Thomas Farris
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Amy Gandy
published 4
3.72
Shannon Isom
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Hannah Quick
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Melissa Starck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mel McRee + Shannon Isom123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carson Bolton
8W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.54
Mel McRee
12W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
4.42
Trevor Paradoski
7W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
Thomas Farris
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.13
4
Amy Gandy
17W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Isom
23W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Hannah Quick
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Starck
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.