Teams

MCC TNT

2025 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-04vs Gage's teamWon 10
W#1 DoublesKandy Grantz / Juliana Massenburg vs Tamara Farwig / Gage Beerer6-2, 6-4
2025-09-28vs Four of a KindLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Hall / Brooke von Tempsky vs Deanna DiBiase / Cynthia Funai3-6, 5-7
2025-09-21vs Gage's teamWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Hall / Brooke von Tempsky vs Gage Beerer / Janet King7-6, 6-4
2025-09-07vs Four of a KindWon 10
W#1 DoublesKandy Grantz / Juliana Massenburg vs Jill Kanahele / Deanna DiBiase6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCC TNT3131338
2Gage's team1313746

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Brooke von Tempsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Catherine Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Juliana Massenburg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Kandy Grantz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kandy Grantz + Juliana Massenburg5256% games+10.4% vs expected
Kandy Grantz + Catherine Hall11556% games−0.1% vs expected
Brooke von Tempsky + Catherine Hall41342% games−1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brooke von Tempsky
58W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Catherine Hall
144W–172L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
Juliana Massenburg
36W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.60
4
Kandy Grantz
76W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.