Teams

LS:Niezrecki 40& Men

2021 ECT Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-20vs GF:Second shot:FasuloLost 13
L#1 DoublesDennis Regan / Hal Robb vs Andrew Bowler / Stephen Murphy4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAgnish Mukhopadhyay vs Robin Goody6-7, 3-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClive Thomas / Rich Clippinger vs Hong Guo / Roger Reynolds2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTom Sedlack / Peter Anastas vs Mark Law / Dr Ronald Delfini7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2021-06-06vs OSB:10s4u:Abate/AlsbachLost 12
L#1 DoublesSergio Wolff / Tom Sedlack vs Tom Hays / Craig Cooke6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRich Clippinger / Peter Anastas vs George Brooks / Kenneth Alsback3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMakarand Jawadekar / Dennis Regan vs Steve Haines / Kevin Cook6-2, 7-5
2021-05-22vs GF:Second shot:FasuloLost 04
L#1 DoublesAgnish Mukhopadhyay / Stanley Niezrecki vs Andrew Bowler / Dean Takahashi3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTom Sedlack vs Robin Goody0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDennis Regan / Sergio Wolff vs Kevin Sullivan / Hong Guo3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Anastas / Makarand Jawadekar vs Pasquale Patrizio / Stephen Murphy0-6, 1-6
2021-05-01vs OSB:10s4u:Abate/AlsbachSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAgnish Mukhopadhyay / Dennis Regan vs John Gage / Bob Hester4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSergio Wolff vs Craig Cooke4-6
W#2 DoublesPeter Anastas / Stanley Niezrecki vs Kenneth Alsback / George Brooks6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRich Clippinger / Makarand Jawadekar vs Rocco Tricarico / David Siniscalco6-2, 6-3
2021-04-24vs GF:Second shot:FasuloLost 13
L#1 DoublesAgnish Mukhopadhyay / Sergio Wolff vs Andrew Bowler / Richard Ste Marie4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTom Sedlack vs Robin Goody1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Anastas / Clive Thomas vs Daniel Fasulo / Kevin Sullivan2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMakarand Jawadekar / Hal Robb vs John Colonese / Ryan Finnegan6-1, 6-4
2021-04-11vs OSB:10s4u:Abate/AlsbachLost 13
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Nelson / Dennis Regan vs Paul Noniewicz / Christopher Yorzinski4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAgnish Mukhopadhyay vs Bob Hester2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStanley Niezrecki / Makarand Jawadekar vs Craig Cooke / George Brooks3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHal Robb / Tom Sedlack vs Steve Haines / Tom Hays6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GF:Second shot:Fasulo0616820170
2OSB:10s4u:Abate/Alsbach06131125216
3LS:Niezrecki 40& Men0671737242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Agnish Mukhopadhyay
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
Hal Robb
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Tom Sedlack
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.99
Rich Clippinger
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.99
Stanley Niezrecki
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Peter Anastas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.68
Clive Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dennis Regan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Gregory Massad
published
Makarand Jawadekar
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Sergio Wolff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Makarand Jawadekar + Stanley Niezrecki3352% games+3.8% vs expected
Makarand Jawadekar + Tom Sedlack1441% games+0.1% vs expected
Peter Anastas + Tom Sedlack5745% games−2.4% vs expected
Tom Sedlack + Sergio Wolff1538% games−4.8% vs expected
Makarand Jawadekar + Sergio Wolff2538% games−12.4% vs expected
Dennis Regan + Hal Robb2338% gamesnot enough data
Rich Clippinger + Peter Anastas044 matchesnot enough data
Clive Thomas + Peter Anastas044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Agnish Mukhopadhyay
31W–78L career · 7 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Hal Robb
27W–32L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tom Sedlack
35W–64L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Rich Clippinger
68W–74L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
2.99
Stanley Niezrecki
25W–51L career · 3 lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
2.99
Peter Anastas
56W–80L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Clive Thomas
40W–141L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
2.68
Dennis Regan
27W–45L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Gregory Massad
7W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Makarand Jawadekar
26W–34L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sergio Wolff
16W–34L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.