Teams

Llewellyn Fall 4.0 40+

2023 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2022- HSV · 4.0 MEN 40N1S3D

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-02vs Laitinen 4P0_40_fall23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Eduardo DelaPaz vs Andrew Plankenhorn / Akram Haggag1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-10-17vs Textor 40+ 4.0 Fall22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPeter Weiland / Thomas Hargrove vs Gary Stephens / Richard Textor2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-13vs HU - KPantLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Walker / Thomas Hargrove vs David Harbarger / Tom Snoddy0-6, 1-6
2022-10-01vs Harris 4.0 40+Won 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Carothers / Thomas Hargrove vs Deden Rukmana / Bono Wasistho2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-09-28vs Laitinen 4P0_40_fall23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Hargrove / Max Washington vs Tim Schlichter / Mark Sommers4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN 40N1S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
3.69
James Steele
published
3.58
Charles Abney
published 4
3.47
Pascal Auburtin
published
3.41
Paul Carothers
published
3.29
Eduardo DelaPaz
published
David Walker
published 3.5
3.21
Michael Rogers
published
3.16
Thomas Hargrove
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Tim Bishop
published
3.06
Peter Weiland
published
3.05
Ricky Llewellyn
published
3.01
Sam Lin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Carothers + Tim Bishop11852% games−2.3% vs expected
James Steele + Charles Abney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Gainer
131W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
James Steele
49W–53L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Charles Abney
22W–35L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Pascal Auburtin
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Paul Carothers
17W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Eduardo DelaPaz
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
David Walker
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Rogers
13W–24L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Thomas Hargrove
87W–114L career · 5 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Tim Bishop
13W–25L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.08
Peter Weiland
12W–45L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Ricky Llewellyn
10W–26L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Sam Lin
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.