Teams

Fields 55+ 3.5

2026 Anniston · Gadsden

5 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Gadsden
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PC: Tumlin40120046
2Fields 55+ 3.50401224144

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Chris Fields
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.03
Billy Le
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.93
Allen Rice
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
LaMont Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Dobbs
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LaMont Stokes + Billy Le4354% gamesnot enough data
Michael Dobbs + Allen Rice033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Fields
24W–38L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Billy Le
8W–16L career · 16 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.03
3
Allen Rice
6W–16L career · type A · 22 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
LaMont Stokes
9W–9L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Dobbs
12W–21L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.