Teams

Z's Last Chance Saloon

2022 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.44 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-17vs NoVa AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Ladenburg / Patrick Thompson vs Christopher Curtin / Christopher Cosca3-6, 4-6
2022-06-13vs Straight Off The CouchWon 10
W#1 DoublesAsher Keam / Charles Tellis vs Thuy Nguyen / Vijay Shah6-2, 6-1
2022-06-03vs Always Causing A RacquetLost 01
L#3 DoublesSumeet Chawla / Tom Ladenburg vs Kyle Truong / Tung Huynh3-6, 1-6
2022-05-20vs MojosLost 01
L#2 DoublesAsher Keam / Charles Tellis vs Simon Bekkali / Chad Wolf7-6, 3-5
2022-05-11vs NoVa AcesLost 01
L#2 SinglesTom Ladenburg vs Manu Balasubramanian1-6, 0-6
2022-04-25vs Always Causing A RacquetLost 02
L#2 DoublesTom Ladenburg / Gregory Fox vs Aravind Krishna / Bruce Rogers6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesScott Gelbman vs Timothy Effio1-6, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Charles Tellis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.20
Asher Keam
published 4.5
4.19
Tom Ladenburg
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Eric Mattelson
published 4.5
4.17
Scott Gelbman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Gregory Fox
published 4.5
4.03
Glenn Jaggard
published 4.5
3.98
Joshua Bandoch
published
3.69
Jeff Buhl
published
3.65
Jeff Rosenblum
published
3.63
Chris Ford
published 4
3.34
Scott Williams
published
Rob Rivera
published
Sumeet Chawla
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenn Jaggard + Eric Mattelson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charles Tellis
92W–54L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Asher Keam
4W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Tom Ladenburg
92W–64L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Eric Mattelson
17W–14L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Scott Gelbman
73W–80L career · 1 line in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Gregory Fox
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Glenn Jaggard
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
4.03
Joshua Bandoch
10W–29L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
Jeff Buhl
21W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jeff Rosenblum
40W–31L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Chris Ford
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.63
Scott Williams
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
3.34
Rob Rivera
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sumeet Chawla
23W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.