Teams

Jhaveri

2024 18&Over Fall Non Advancing · 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-08vs LyderSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNeil Goodman / Bradford Pelletier vs Austin Zalkin / Paul Haydon6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesShantanu Godbole vs Josh Spiegel2-6, 3-6
2024-10-17vs Rosner/PhamLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Koppelman / Shantanu Godbole vs Robert Pees / Emmanuel Antoni2-6, 0-6
2024-09-25vs LyderLost 01
L#1 DoublesNeil Dharia / Jack Boller vs Eshan Mithani / Josh Spiegel7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-19vs Full Metal RacquetsWon 10
W#1 SinglesShantanu Godbole vs Lenny Neslin6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cohen010201025235
2Lyder01019925214
3Rosner/Pham010141537269
4Jhaveri010121839280
5McEnroes01042653320

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Winson Wong
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.31
Neil Goodman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ali Joulaee
published 3.5
Amir Bazargan
published 3.5
Bradford Pelletier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jack Boller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Shantanu Godbole
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Amish Jhaveri
published 3.5
2.76
Neil Dharia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Crozier
published
Rob Quatrone
published
Robert Koppelman
published
Timothy Wojcik
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amir Bazargan + Ali Joulaee213 matchesnot enough data
Bradford Pelletier + Neil Goodman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Winson Wong
86W–77L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Neil Goodman
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Ali Joulaee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Amir Bazargan
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Bradford Pelletier
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Jack Boller
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Shantanu Godbole
18W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Amish Jhaveri
24W–63L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
Neil Dharia
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
Jeff Crozier
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rob Quatrone
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Koppelman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Wojcik
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.