Teams

HG GREEN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-04vs CCC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Custer / Bradley Scott vs Mike Miller / Marko Vukovich1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTed McCausland vs Kent Bassett2-6, 1-6
2023-08-28vs SKY YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Burge / Ted McCausland vs John Camins / Jason Dewees6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBryan Langman / Mark Custer vs John Sanders / Stewart Schley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-21vs KC-CC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Burge / Mark Custer vs Terry McDaniel / Randy Rosenburg3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-08-14vs KC-CC GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTed McCausland / Miles David vs Audie Rubin / John Kesner7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMark Custer vs Scott Adams0-6, 0-6
2023-07-31vs EM NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Burge / Mark Custer vs TIMOTHY DENEZZA / Jeff Sigman2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-07-24vs SS-H ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesTed McCausland / Bradley Scott vs Jason Carr / Damon Piccone0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Miles David
published
2.94
Brandon Aslin
published 3
2.94
Ted McCausland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.91
Bryan Langman
published 3
2.51
Mark Custer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.40
Bradley Scott
published 2.5
Daniel McGowan
published 2.5
Jeremy Roberts
published
Ray Rosado
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Custer + Bryan Langman3547% games+1.9% vs expected
Ted McCausland + Mark Custer4160% gamesnot enough data
Ted McCausland + Bryan Langman314 matchesnot enough data
Mark Custer + Brandon Aslin314 matchesnot enough data
Bradley Scott + Mark Custer033 matchesnot enough data
Bryan Langman + Brandon Aslin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miles David
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Brandon Aslin
33W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Ted McCausland
42W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Bryan Langman
21W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
2.5
Mark Custer
28W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Bradley Scott
15W–29L career · no lines in 2023
0%75%25%
2.40
2.5
Daniel McGowan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeremy Roberts
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ray Rosado
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.