Teams

18 & Over Women 2.5 - Caguas Minelis Sanchez

Adult 18 & Over 2022 · 2022 18 & Over Women 2.5 - Flight 1

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesJelitza Delgado Rosado / Valeria M Santos Colom vs Suehaily Velasco / Patricia Fernandez Perez6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Polanco / Glenda Medina Rios vs Laura Barbosa / Marianela Cuadrado7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJelitza Delgado Rosado vs Alondra S Roman Gonzalez6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGlenda Medina Rios / Astrid Landron vs Velia Gomez / Tatiana Rotger6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMineli Sanchez / Jelitza Delgado Rosado vs Valerie Ortiz / Patricia Cabrera5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesValeria M Santos Colom / Glenda Medina Rios vs Mariela Vega / Danishia Santiago Figueroa3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJelitza Delgado Rosado vs Karennie Malave6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesGlenda Medina Rios / Valeria M Santos Colom vs Alexandra Escudero / Leyre Santaella1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesStephanie Polanco / Glenda Medina Rios vs Suehaily Velasco / Marianela Cuadrado6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJelitza Delgado Rosado vs Lilia Pacheco6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJelitza Delgado Rosado vs Keyla Garcia6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesStephanie Polanco / Glenda Medina Rios vs Khadine Kubal / Alondra S Roman Gonzalez3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJelitza Delgado Rosado vs Kseniya Olson7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJelitza Delgado Rosado vs Keyla Garcia6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAstrid Landron / Wanda Ivelisse Perez vs Michelle ONeill / Viviana Soto5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJelitza Delgado Rosado vs Tatiana Rotger6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 18 & Over Women 2.5 - Flight 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Jelitza Delgado Rosado
usually #1 Singles 69%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
2.63
Glenda Medina Rios
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.37
Arelis Fontanez
published 3
2.21
Astrid Landron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.05
Mineli Sanchez
published
Stephanie Polanco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Astrid Landron + Glenda Medina Rios1739% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jelitza Delgado Rosado
83W–55L career · 16 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
3
Glenda Medina Rios
27W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Arelis Fontanez
20W–20L career · no lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
2.37
2.5
Astrid Landron
24W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.21
Mineli Sanchez
7W–19L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Stephanie Polanco
15W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Valeria M Santos Colom
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.