Teams

Thomas: Racquettes

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 3.0 WOMEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-12vs Chase's Aces ES/FallLost 23
L#1 DoublesChristine Thomas / Mary Ellen Wells vs Sandra Pons / Elizabeth Winberg2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesHanyin Ma vs Meng Zhang7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLuoyu Shen / Liz Rowland vs Mary Frances Price / Alisa Chase0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAndrea Sterk vs Danielle Stewart6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLucy Fisk / Ally Gall vs Mary Tham / Karen Kasner6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-21vs Londer: OverservedLost 14
L#1 DoublesMary Ellen Wells / Hanna Weil vs Brooke Anthony / Lindsay Anthony0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHanyin Ma vs Andrea Golden Fineblum6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMargaret Christopher / Lucy Fisk vs Allison Perry / Amanda Getchell4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAlly Gall vs Raleigh Miller3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Schurhamer / Cynthia Segura vs Sara Goldfine / Jenny Javitch1-6, 0-6
2024-10-28vs Butwin: Lucillle 3Won 41
W#1 DoublesLucy Fisk / Ally Gall vs Michelle Goldstein / Nina Badzin6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Sterk vs Mary Idzik5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Segura / Bettina Wernimont vs Erin Harting / Elyse Scheuer6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHanyin Ma vs Kari Chester6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnat Gold / Hanna Weil vs Julie Greenbaum / Leigh Waterman6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Bettina Wernimont
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Hanna Weil
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Lucy Fisk
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ally Gall
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Andrea Sterk
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.69
Anat Gold
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Liz Rowland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Mary Ellen Wells
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Cynthia Segura
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Luoyu Shen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Margaret Christopher
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.46
Christine Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.12
Laura Schurhamer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Hanyin Ma
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Thomas + Bettina Wernimont1544% games+4.1% vs expected
Lucy Fisk + Ally Gall5545% games−0.1% vs expected
Cynthia Segura + Bettina Wernimont4348% games−6.4% vs expected
Cynthia Segura + Christine Thomas0722% games−20.6% vs expected
Christine Thomas + Liz Rowland3257% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Christopher + Laura Schurhamer044 matchesnot enough data
Hanna Weil + Christine Thomas213 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Christopher + Lucy Fisk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bettina Wernimont
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Hanna Weil
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Lucy Fisk
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Ally Gall
7W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Andrea Sterk
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Anat Gold
6W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Liz Rowland
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Mary Ellen Wells
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Cynthia Segura
9W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Luoyu Shen
8W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Margaret Christopher
8W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Christine Thomas
7W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Laura Schurhamer
8W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Hanyin Ma
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.