Teams

Lakewood - Gordon 40+

2024 Adult 40 & Over Women Fall Day-Mobile · 3.5 Women Day 40+

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Day 40+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Anna Bruckmann
published 4
Diana Newman
published 4
3.70
Lauren Barkin
published
3.70
Kathy Gordon
published
3.53
Jaime Cooper
published
3.37
Molly Spain
published
3.27
Robin Coleman
published
Ashleigh McKenzie
published 3.5
3.21
Wanda Schoen
published
3.16
Breana Duncan
published 3.5
3.16
Andrea Fugard
published 3.5
3.11
Gini Coody
published
3.10
Cathy Spehar
published 3.5
2.63
Stella Martin
published
Janet Musall
published
Peggy Devaney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Gordon + Lauren Barkin8358% games+4.7% vs expected
Andrea Fugard + Breana Duncan6456% games+3.1% vs expected
Molly Spain + Wanda Schoen224 matchesnot enough data
Jaime Cooper + Anna Bruckmann303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Bruckmann
44W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Diana Newman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Barkin
39W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.70
Kathy Gordon
20W–14L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Jaime Cooper
28W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.53
Molly Spain
22W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Robin Coleman
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ashleigh McKenzie
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wanda Schoen
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Breana Duncan
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Andrea Fugard
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Gini Coody
42W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
3.5
Cathy Spehar
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Stella Martin
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.63
Janet Musall
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peggy Devaney
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.