Teams

Duval/Berger/40&Over3.5M

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Men · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-08vs Marsh Creek - HolubWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndy Fricke / Chuck King vs John Hannah / Gary Holub6-4, 6-2
2025-02-22vs Baymeadows - GordonWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndy Fricke / Chuck King vs Ratnam Punukollu / Roger Otto6-3, 6-4
2025-02-15vs ABCC - PradoWon 41
W#1 DoublesDan Calvo / Praveen Nair vs James Jordan / Rob McFaul6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesGiancarlo Marchesi vs David Sliwinski6-1
W#2 DoublesMike Rhodes / Chuck King vs Todd Lewis / Marcelo Prado6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErik Berger / Kenneth Black vs Keith Tingle / David Lamolinara6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesStephen Bennett / Richard Rivas vs Peter Staats / Alan Gasparovic6-4, 6-4
2025-02-08vs Marsh Creek - HolubWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndy Fricke / Mike Rhodes vs Gene Greiner / John Hannah6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-01vs Jax Golf - HernandezWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndy Fricke / Chuck King vs Jeff Gallagher / Michael Hernandez6-1, 6-4
2025-01-18vs Glen Kernan - SanyalWon 10
W#2 DoublesChuck King / Andy Fricke vs David Bisson / Craig Kaye6-1, 6-1
2025-01-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRichard Rivas / Andy Fricke vs Michael Peters / John Walsh4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Giancarlo Marchesi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.70
David Reynolds
published 4
3.55
Dan Calvo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Andy Fricke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.34
Mike Rhodes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Robert Phillips
published
3.24
Richard Rivas
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Erik Berger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kenneth Black
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Giancarlo Marchesi
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
David Reynolds
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Dan Calvo
19W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Andy Fricke
106W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Mike Rhodes
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
Robert Phillips
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Richard Rivas
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Erik Berger
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Kenneth Black
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.