Teams

NB Slice Girls

2026 COMBO · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-14vs Tito’s to the NetWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Lundwall / Victoria Nanos vs Bettina Walker / Tamara Naquin6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Schmidgall / Ashley Hott vs Jamie Shomette / Kelly Horne3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-14vs Dos RitasWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeidi Haddock / Victoria Nanos vs Ally Winslow / Zdenka Edgar6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAmanda Reed / Eloise Zatopek vs Heather Wilkinson / Terrilee Tatum6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJami Painter / Sarah Schmidgall vs Cassandra Wagner / Monica Salazar4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-13vs Sets in the CityLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Just / Marissa Murray vs Mollie Garcia / Kacey Wernli6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Hott / Heather Lundwall vs Terrie Butcher / Lilya Matos1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeidi Haddock / Amy Flowers vs Courtney Meier / Rena Nance6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-06-12vs A Winning ComboLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Just / Sarah Schmidgall vs Jill Rogers Fitch / Tess Gutierrez3-6, 4-1
L#2 DoublesAshley Hott / Jami Painter vs Edie Wright / Paula Decas5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEloise Zatopek / Amanda Reed vs Veronica Flores / Katie Vincent2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sets in the City31102797
2A Winning Combo31841093
3Tito’s to the Net226615126
4NB Slice Girls224818119
5Dos Ritas0421022142

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Victoria Nanos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Judy Sotelo
published
3.68
Michelle Just
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Ashley Hott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Sarah Schmidgall
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Eloise Zatopek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.38
Amanda Reed
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Heidi Haddock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Amy Flowers
published 3.5
3.18
Jami Painter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Nanos
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.85
Judy Sotelo
60W–34L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Michelle Just
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Ashley Hott
15W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
Sarah Schmidgall
13W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.53
4
Eloise Zatopek
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Amanda Reed
41W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Heidi Haddock
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Amy Flowers
no matches on record · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Jami Painter
16W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.