Teams

The Mojitos

2023 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-03-29vs RubinoLost 01
L#1 DoublesShalen Fairbanks / Nancy Trimble vs Tria Thalman / Sharon Sabasteanski4-5
2023-03-26vs PapadropshotsLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlison Serino / Rosemary Gwynn vs Danielle Woo / Jayne Korolkoff1-6, 2-6
2023-03-23vs Lucky RackettesLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlison Serino / Lindsay Ragheb vs Winny Zhang / Chanpen Teeranon3-6, 2-6
2023-03-11vs EvolutionWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlison Serino / Laura Henmueller vs Telesia Hundley / Valerie Stoehr5-0
2023-03-03vs RubinoWon 10
W#3 DoublesPolyxena Speros / Alison Serino vs Cora Ho / Penelope Bell6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-02-26vs PapadropshotsLost 01
L#2 DoublesLindsay Ragheb / Nancy Trimble vs Gillian Moorhead / Yunden Jinsmaa4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-02-04vs EvolutionLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlison Serino / Nancy Trimble vs Jessica Seedyke / Elizabeth Pugh5-7, 2-6
2023-01-26vs RubinoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlison Serino / Polyxena Speros vs Cynthia Coe / Carolyn Greis6-0, 6-0
2023-01-18vs PapadropshotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesPolyxena Speros / Nancy Trimble vs Julia Latein-Kimmig / Sandy Horowitz4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-01-14vs Lucky RackettesLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichele Glidden / Alison Serino vs Sarah Speirs / Chanpen Teeranon6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Cecilia Jones
published 4
3.63
Laura Henmueller
published 4
3.49
Alison Serino
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.47
Shalen Fairbanks
published
3.33
Desiree Nichtula
published 3.5
3.17
Darcie Hammer
published 3.5
2.95
Nancy Trimble
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.81
Polyxena Speros
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Trimble + Alison Serino3349% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Trimble + Laura Henmueller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecilia Jones
48W–52L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Laura Henmueller
121W–170L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Alison Serino
162W–124L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Shalen Fairbanks
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Desiree Nichtula
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Darcie Hammer
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Nancy Trimble
252W–415L career · 4 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
Melissa Hayes-Gehrke
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
2.81
Polyxena Speros
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.